Manufacturer: | Scratch |
Brief:
Two rocket assemblies designed to be flown as one single stage rocket, or flown
as 2 independent rockets. Parachute/streamer for recovery selected on a whim
depending on wind conditions.
Construction:
All components are from an Estes Designer Special kit from some years ago.
Construction method is very straightforward. Son selected tubes and nosecones, then found coupler to allow one to sit on the other. He picked the fin shape, which I copied onto balsa sheet and cut/sanded to match.
Paint is Krylon white, with crude masking used for hand painting of blue EOE lettering. Eliminator of Eliminators - to shoot down the Estes Eliminator rocket we had completed prior to this one!
I drew the letters for the lower stage on masking tape, he did the upper. Then I cut out the letters, taped in place, and the holes were painted in. Didn't turn out too bad.
Flight:
We had previously launched the lower stage by itself with no difficulties.
This morning (6-31-02) we launched them assembled as one unit. I elected to have both halves come down on one 'chute as I wasn't sure what the winds were going to do, and wanted it to come down sooner rather than later in one place and not two.
Setup was as follows (remembering that all attachments are made with swivel hooks to screw eyes in wood):
Flight went up doing 3-4 pretty tight but easily observable spirals, and the ejection charge blew normally.
However, instead of coming down as 2 pieces dangling from one chute, somehow after ejection the lower body got jammed onto one of the fins of the upper body, and the whole assemblage came down in an upside down V under the parachute.
Damage is minimal - one slightly cracked fin, and the lower body tube slightly torn in two places where it got jammed.
Next time, if more eyes are available for tracking, we will allow it to come in two separate pieces.
Summary:
Pros - the rocket was easy to build, and flew pretty nicely. The swivel hooks
(found in Walmart fishing department) allow easy configuration changes in the
field.
Cons - the decision to keep the two halves connected detracted from the recovery. I wonder if perhaps the lower stage rubber band snapped the two halves back together after ejection. Perhaps a longer distance between the two (via Kevlar® yarn) would have allowed for cleaner separation. Certainly separate recovery would have.
Not sure what I could have done to prevent the spiral flight - not sure I can put fins on any straighter than I did.
Other:
Get involved with your kids - my son had a blast choosing the design. He
selected all the components, picked the paint scheme, enjoyed helping to paint
it, and really enjoyed launching it and then chasing it down. Granted, I did
all the assembly, but he's only 7, and maybe by next summer he won't mind
getting glue on his fingers and will have enough patience to hold fins in place
while the glue dries.
Sponsored Ads