The Launch Pad Hawk MIM-23A

The Launch Pad - Hawk MIM-23A {Kit}

Contributed by Barry Forrest

Construction Rating: starstarstarstarstar_border
Flight Rating: starstarstarstarstar_border
Overall Rating: starstarstarstarstar_border
Published: 2011-01-01
Manufacturer: The Launch Pad


[Rocket Pic]After constructing and flying a few Estes kits, and building the Aerotech Arreux, I thought I'd try my hand at building a scale missile from The Launch Pad.  Having never tried their kits, I was in for some surprises. Upon receiving the HAWK kit, I opened to find no decals, thin body tubing (like Estes), and a small Mylar chute with thread for shroud lines. I decided to deviate from the design a bit to insure what I thought would make the HAWK more durable.

The instructions are great, all parts included, and a nice layout to outline the painting and detail work.

Construction:

The nose cone is shaped to a point by adding a paper cone to the top.  The instructions say to "paint" the paper cone with thin CA to make it tough and aide against sanding damage. I upgrading it by filling the paper cone with epoxy just before attaching to the nose cone and coated it entirely with finishing epoxy. This would make the cone easy to sand and shape, as well as to insure it would not be damaged by hard landings. 

The tail cone is made from paper like the nose addition. After attaching to the main airframe, I coated with finishing epoxy and feathered into the airframe. I also epoxied a length of stiff cardboard around the inside of the extension to "beef up" the inner tube so no damage would occur from hard landings.

The airframe is supplied in 2 parts with a coupler. I used tite bond wood glue to bond and then coated the seam with finishing epoxy.  There is a chute compartment floor ring (with 8 1/4" holes or a big 1" hole) that is installed later, 6" from the top of the frame so upon launch the chute will not slide down and change the CG.

The fins are long but are easy to make (even the small detail on the ends) with the supplied tracing sheet. Once attached to the airframe (I used 5 min epoxy) and filleted (with 15 min epoxy), I coated them with finishing epoxy. They are fairly durable but because of the balsa core, a hard impact will make the epoxy chip off. You could paint them with CA. Next time I would fiberglass the fins and the airframe to aide in durability.

Painting is easy as it is all flat white. The lettering and block detailing was done with decals I made with Labco decal paper, printed from my computer and copier, and fine pinstriping tape. Once applied the entire rocket was coated with matt finish Krylon.

For recovery, I upgraded the shock cord from the 1/4" elastic to 1/2" elastic and made it 6 feet long. I attached it with tite bond to the inside of the airframe tube with the paper anchor supplied but made the anchor a bit bigger. I also attached a Nomex® chute protector from Pratt Hobbies. I also use a few pieces of Estes wadding to insure no damage to the chute. I use a 24" nylon chute.

1st flight was with a F24-4W reload. It Came off the pad nice and straight and went about 1000'. Ejection was perfect at 4 secs. and it landed under the 24" chute with no damage or scratches what so ever.

2nd flight (or should I say almost) The tail slide down and wedged it on the stand off making it stick to the pad. No damage but would use a used motor case on the bottom of the rod next time to prevent this from happening.

3rd flight. Disaster struck! Disaster struck! I accidentally loaded and E18 instead of the F39-4T. Not enough initial thrust and was lazy off the pad causing it to weather cock and end up as a ballistic into the ground sideways. Nose cone damaged by tearing out the bottom and also destroyed the top 9" of the airframe (right to the top of where the fins attach to the frame). All fins survived and where slighted chipped in small places.

I guess that teaches me to mark and bag every reload kit and not rush to get that last launch in. 

It's been along 3 months since I started rebuilding it, but the HAWK is all fixed and ready to fly again. It looks just as if nothing had ever happened. 

CONSTRUCTION: (Rating 4) 

Upgrade to fiberglass airframe, fins, and boat tail. (I would next time) Add epoxy to fill paper nose attachment and use finish coating to smooth. (made is VERY durable and easy to shape) Add stiffener to inner tail cone tube. (added protection)

FLIGHT/RECOVERY: (Rating 4) 

Upgrade to 1/2" elastic shock cord, 6' long and make paper anchor bigger. Use Nomex® chute protector. Use 24" nylon chute instead of 18" mylar supplied.

Motors--
SU motors
E15-4
E30-4
Reload
F24-4W (works best)
F39-4T

DO NOT USE Estes D OR E engines as they will make it crash even in very light wind!

OVERALL: (Rating 4)

For under $30 it's a good kit even with the need for the 24" chute, upgrading the shock cord, and having to make your own decals. I plan on buying more of them in the future. Currently I've almost finished the Standard AGM-78 which I've upgraded to a 29mm motor, fiberglassed entirely, and used many HP techniques. 

Flights

Comments:

avatar
M.W. (September 1, 2000)
I built and flew this model exactly per the kit instructions with stunning results. Maiden flight was conducted during a model rocket club meet, on a calm sunny day on an D12-3. Subsequent flight was on an E15-4 and third flight on the day was on an E30-7. The model suffered very minor nose damage which was easily repaired. All flights went straight up, parachute ejection was flawless. Very nice descent. Maximum altitude on the E30 was roughly 800 feet. Very easy to visually track the model. I painted the model olive green and used vinyl decals. Many nice comments from club members regarding the completed product.
avatar
E.C. (January 1, 2001)
It truly was a very nice kit requiring attention to detail, and some challenging techniques. I think, as Chuck Barndt said, that a D or E would be sufficient if the rocket is built stock. I too modified the kit, not because the kit is bad, it's just the way I do things. I've added a longer motor tube and an additional centering ring, a 1/4 inch brass launch lug, a shock cord mount design stolen from Loc, a 3/8 by 16 foot shock cord, a fiberglass covered balsa nose cone tip, a nylon parachute, and made the bottom, outside corners of the fins out of 1/8 inch ply for extra durability. I, like Chuck Barndt, enjoy work that makes something exceptional, and I think this is a great mid-powered rocket, whether it is built stock or modified to your own liking.

It looks like you [the writer] have a rocket to be proud of. I just think that the warning in all caps pertains to your rocket only rather than the majority built. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, but due to your reinforcements, your rocket probably came out heavier than the majority, so, I believe that it is ok, for the lighter, stock Army Hawk's made to fly on D and E motors.

comment Post a Comment